I really hope to be wrong about how deep the deception of these wars go, but it is fairly certain that we have another mechanized insider trading opportunity being formed around the eagerness of people to accept the World might be better than it really is, and those who take advantage of it.
It is hard to see people actually being fooled by it. The USA is doing a "propaganda war" and people fall for it. You see all around people talking about what the USA says it does, and doesnt do afterall. How Trump chicken out, how Trump hallucinates talks and deals.
Very few people is taking notice that behind that, USA is fighting a guerrilla war, doing actual despicable acts which seem to not be caught by the "commentators¨.
You have, allegedly, hundreds of USA people being flown to military related hospitals in nearby NATO countries, you have so called "ghost strikes", attacks that happen but no one knows if they happened or not, and the main weapon of these wars: Ceasefires and Peace Talks.
A Ceasefire can be a pause for trying to find peace, but this is not the case. The USA objective, which has nothing to do with Israel, is clearly not achieved. And the USA is not really in the stopping mood. However, people are talking so much about what Trump does not do, what he might not be able to, what he might not want to, that most people are not really seeing what he has done.
A simple principle we do in Economics to find out "cui bono". Remove the talks, remove the media, remove the supposedly USA BS motives, and its links to Israel. What still there? What happens in all these situations, and who benefits? You will find that USA still destroying Iran, USA itself still not harmed, as I will talk about ahead, and still, its markets are taking "smart money" to a ride and "insider money" to a height. The people still moving the imperialism ahead, and the only people losing are far away from the USA.
Then, foreshadowed, people ask: Well, Iran did exploded USA bases around the region. Sure the USA lost something there.
Not really. Bases are not embassies, and even if they were, they still not really a "hard asset" in terms of significant loss, should they were expected to be destroyed. Think about it. What a company does to capitalize its assets? Liquidate them. The USA sure losing a base here, or equipment there, but as a movie quote once: "USA often leave the hardware in places because it is expensive to ship it back."
Who actually loses when a UAE USA base is damaged? Which region resources is used to fix it if any? Which place will bear the opportunity cost of not having that base destroyed? Which place will really bear the loss of it being damaged, by being collateral damage? And who is losing actual people in their actual region who never asked to be in a war?
People really should think about what is being done, and how it is being done, and stop with the "talk wars". Maybe the USA is losing in the long run, and maybe the USA is doing wrong to its own people, but as always, the USA people "cry" for something, but not really take the actual damage. It is "pretty" to say all those words and curse at the president, but take note, some are losing more and more important things than the other, and that should never be resumed to narratives of victory.
No one wins a war, some lose less than others.